I’ve been
hearing and reading all morning how “Marco Rubio nailed it,” especially in his
response to Jeb Bush, when Bush suggested if he weren’t going to do a United
States Senator’s work, he resign. Rubio made two arguments:
(2)
And did he (Bush) know how many votes his campaign’s model, John McCain, missed
when he was running for the nomination?
Nailed it!
NOT. At least no one that took and passed Philo 101* could say so. Pay
attention again, students of logic: both arguments are fallacies, ad hominem and, let’s call it, innocence by association. “You’re only
saying this because . . .” doesn’t make what “you” says wrong any more than “Well,
John did it” makes what “I” is doing right.
(Nailed it.)
_______________
* apparently not required of journalism students
(Nailed it.)
_______________
* apparently not required of journalism students
No comments:
Post a Comment