Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Prepperoni Pizza (alone in front of Night of the Living Dead)

Always three days late and a four-dollar bill short, I’m just getting to Kevin Sullivan’s insightful but mistitled “A fortress against fear” from the August 27 Washington Post (online here). And I wouldn’t have gotten to it at all, if one of my coffee buddies hadn’t recommended it.

Prepped
The article is all about “preppers,” those prepared for whichever man-made apocalypse is just around the corner. Preppers have the right extinguisher for every kind of fire, the shield for whatever shit hits the fan. Most live in what apparently has come to be known as the American Redoubt, which Sullivan describes as “a settlement of the God-fearing in a lightly populated territory that includes Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and the eastern parts of Washington and Oregon.
        Except they don’t live there; they survive. That’s one of the two fundamental mistakes preppers make. They confuse living and surviving. The other: they also equate security with a well-supplied fortress that may be fire and shit-storm proof but doesn’t keep out fear.

When I walk down to the corner for coffee – as I will later this morning – and meet with whoever happens to be there and when we talk about the weather first, then about whatever is on our fraying minds, in our decaying hearts, or gnawing at our bowels, I am living – we are.
        When I drive my 4x4 back home and carefully lock, deadbolt, and chain the door behind me, then go down to my bomb shelter to check the freezer and oil and reload my guns, I am not. I may be surviving, but I am not living. It is the difference between sex with another person when you don’t care who hears and sex with a magazine when your mother might come through the door at any minute.

But, let’s say, down in my basement shelter, oiling my guns, I slide into my crank-radio a CD of Christian music and, unaccountably! among the slick, sick songs of praise, there is a poorly recorded, home-made track of a half-empty church singing, “A Mighty Fortress.”

For still our ancient foe
Doth seek to work us woe;
His craft and power are great,
And armed with cru-él hate;
On earth is not his equal.
Rita Hayworth in a strapless gown

Then I have to realize, don’t I, that the gun I am dressing can not kill what really ails me any more than reinforced concrete walls sunk deep under a back woods of the Idaho panhandle will keep him/her/it out. (Not that I actually live in Idaho.) (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.)
        Even if secure meant only safe from harm, I am not secure even there. But secure means more than safe. Safe is to secure as wearing body armor to a riot is to wearing a ball gown to . . . well, a ball.

To sum up:
-       It is better to drink coffee with friends than to oil one’s gun alone.
-       Martin Luther wrote better hymns than Chris Tomlin does.
-       It is better to be secure in a strapless gown than safe behind the freezer, even if it contains a two-year supply of bottled water and venison jerky.

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Eight reasons to like Mike Pence

 1. He doesn’t hate homosexuals only homosexuality.

 2. The globe will not warm if he becomes vice president.

 3. At the same time he’s almost invisible, and

 4. he's shiny like a penny. Related to that,

 5. he’s only 1% as bad as Donald Trump. (So in the currency of the Kingdom of Misogynexenophobia, it is indeed 100 pence to the trump.)

 6. His resignation as governor of Indiana elevated Count Chockula to the job.

 7. In Mississippi, his name rhymes with back fence.

 8. Good hair.

Friday, August 5, 2016

"No more Trump. No more Trump!"

On August 21 of last year, I suggested that I wasn’t going to write any
more about Donald Trump; and I didn’t (much more) until mid-March of this year, when I advanced several “non-propositions,” still hoping that he would disappear, though acknowledging that “the limits of God’s grace are sometimes too painfully apparent.”   

Among the non-propositions:
1. It is not Trump’s fault that he is a jackass; but it is his fault that he acts like one – and it is our fault when we permit him to.
and
c. Trump follows no one but himself, an ego without a heart and an id without a soul.

“An ego without a heart and an id without a soul” and according to the sign in front of a house on the other end of Main Street . . .
     Well, here is 2 Corinthians 7:13-14. The Lord is speaking to Solomon:
«
When I shut up the heavens so that there is no rain, or command the locust to devour the land, or send pestilence among my people, if my people . . . humble themselves, and pray and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
»
I would like to say that the Hebrew for “pestilence” is תרמף – trump. But it’s not; nor do I think that was what the sign-maker thought. (Note: its not ובמה either.) Indeed, probably the only thing he or she and I agree on is that we’re in a mess . . . and talking to each other isn’t going to get us out of it.

So no more talking – about Trump – for a while, it’s not that you can’t get your fix on any other street corner in town. No more talking about Trump except for an occasional mel ball drawing on our Facebook page. You can follow us there. Just hit the link over to the right somewhere. And in the meantime . . .
     God bless you. And God bless the United States of America.

Thursday, August 4, 2016

H is for honest.


H
honest 'wī-lē   
     adj. terminus politicus
     1. Lies less than the next guy.

Ex. “Hillary Clinton is fundamentally honest and trustworthy.” – Jill Abramson. In fact, according to PoltiFact, what she says is true or mostly true 60% of the time!

Monday, August 1, 2016

Trump Motors introduces the Cruellus De Ville

I have been casting around, looking for a good definition of cruelty. It’s what I do when I don’t understand something; I try to define terms.  Cruel seems to have come into English from the Old French cru(d)el from the Latin crudelis, meaning “unfeeling, hard-hearted,” related to crudus, “raw, rough, bloody.” In modern English it can express either callous indifference to, or pleasure in causing, another’s pain or suffering.

I am trying to make out what is behind the Republican nominee’s attitude toward . . . any number of people, individuals and groups. Is he callously indifferent, or does he take pleasure in being mean? I suspect the former. (Or, maybe, I hope the former.)
     Granted he is willful; I don’t think he is willfully unkind. I see the man rather as so self-focused he can’t see outside himself. It’s not that he wants to hurt the Khans, for example. Rather he can’t understand them as people that can be hurt as he can be hurt. He doesn’t understand that about anyone else.
     Because for him no one else truly exists – not as he does.

He is road rage, which becomes possible for most of us because we are surrounded by our cars as are those that have enraged us. We have no comprehension of – and we desire no understanding of – those inside those other cars; we only know that they have gotten in the way of what we intended to do. They have no personality, no character, no being other than “that b*****d,” “that stupid b****,” or especially “this what-the-f***(?)-er.”
     Which is possible for almost all of us when we are surrounded by our cars as are those that have enraged us and we have no desire to understand them; we only know that they are in our way.